On President Biden’s 100th day in office, Nilson Barahona-Marriaga joined demonstrators who greeted the president at a rally in Atlanta. “End detention now!” they chanted. “Communities are afraid!”

A 39-year-old immigrant from Honduras, Nilson had been recently released from Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) Irwin County Detention Center in Ocilla, Georgia. The Irwin detention center, which remains open despite the Biden administration’s promise to end its contract with the facility, had most recently gained attention due to multiple allegations of involuntary hysterectomies performed on women at the facility.

When Nilson was detained at Irwin last year, he learned through his lawyer that coronavirus was present at the facility. ICE officials had failed to alert or protect staff and detainees. Facility staff regularly failed to wear masks and ensure disinfection.

Out of desperation, Nilson participated in a hunger strike with other detainees. Their group made common-sense demands that ICE follow public health guidelines, provide them with masks and cleaning supplies, and release medically vulnerable people from detention. Instead, facility officials threw Nilson and his fellow hunger strikers in solitary confinement. ICE cut off the water in their cells, so they could not drink, wash, or flush the toilets. Officials also restricted Nilson’s communications with his lawyer and family. Only nine days later, when Nilson realized that a person detained in the room next to his had COVID-19, did he end his hunger strike.

In the last year, hundreds of detained immigrants like Nilson have participated in a growing number of hunger strikes nationwide, seeking protection from COVID-19. ICE officials and detention staff have met these hunger strikes—protected speech under the First Amendment–with extreme measures, including increased use of force such as pepper spray, physical force, and rubber bullets. Today, detained immigrants are currently on hunger strike for the same reason at a number of facilities, including the Northwest Detention Center in Tacoma, Washington, and Bergen County Jail in New Jersey. After several months of declines, ICE has again begun to increase the number of detained people in custody. COVID-19 cases in ICE detention are again on the rise.

Our new report, Behind Closed Doors: Abuse and Retaliation Against Hunger Strikers in U.S. Immigration Detention, by the ACLU and Physicians for Human Rights, reveals that the scope and scale of ICE’s cruelty in response to such hunger strikes is much broader than previously known. Based on an assessment of over 10,000 pages of previously disclosed documents, the report analyzes hundreds of hunger strikes in ICE detention from 2013 to 2017, as well as the testimony of recent hunger strikers. The report finds that abuse and retaliation against hunger strikers is commonplace and dates back to President Biden’s time as vice president. ICE has responded to hunger strikes with involuntary medical procedures, solitary confinement, retaliatory deportation and transfer, and use of force — responses which are in violation of constitutional protections, international human rights law, and medical ethics.

Our report also shines a light on the many forms of day-to-day psychological coercion ICE employs to try to break hunger strikes, including denying access to basic privileges, restricting water access, and threatening prosecution.

Rather than safeguarding their patients’ health, medical professionals played a disturbing role in these abuses. During an August 2016 hunger strike of 22 mothers at the Berks County family detention center in Pennsylvania a family detention, an ICE physician sought to downplay the situation. The ICE physician also proposed family separation and force-feeding as responses to the hunger strike, noting that “If it appears they really are on a hunger strike, we will need to separate the mother and children – send mom to an IHSC facility to address the hunger strike.”

Doctors and nurses employed or contracted by ICE also violated medical ethics by supporting government motions for invasive and involuntary medical procedures, including force-feeding, forced hydration, forced urinary catherization, involuntary blood draws, and use of restraints. Our report identifies at least 14 separate ICE medical declarations supporting government motions for such involuntary procedures, in violation of physician’s ethical obligations to preserve the autonomy of mentally competent individuals, as well as international human rights law.

Our report reveals the lengths to which ICE will go to punish and deter hunger strikers rather than engage with their legitimate demands. Changing the response to hunger strikes will require addressing their underlying cause: an abusive and dangerous civil immigration detention system.

President Biden – who oversaw these abuses when Vice President – should reverse course and end the U.S. reliance on a mass immigration detention system and invest in community-based social services as alternatives to detention. Health professionals should refuse to participate in violations of medical ethics in their provision of care to detained immigrants, and government lawyers should refrain from pursuing cases for force feeding and other involuntary medical procedures.

In December 2018, the Trump administration started forcing asylum seekers at the southern border to wait long periods of time in Northern Mexico while a makeshift tent “court” considered their asylum case in the United States. Under this unprecedented policy—cynically named “Migrant Protection Protocols”—the U.S. government returned to extreme violence and destitution tens of thousands of  highly vulnerable individuals and families who were already fleeing persecution in their home countries.

After escaping her tormentors’ impunity in Guatemala in 2019, hoping to reunite with her husband and their six-year-old daughter and apply for asylum in Miami, Elia Lopez and her three-year-old daughter were held up by the U.S. government for over a year and a half in the state of Tamaulipas—a “Do Not Travel” location, according to the U.S. State Department, due to rampant crime and kidnappings. Because they are fluent only in Mam—an indigenous language for which the “Remain in Mexico” system (unlike the regular asylum system it upended) provided no interpreters—their repeated pleas not to be returned to Mexico were never fully heard. This was by design, in yet another vicious attempt by the last administration to flout even its most basic legal obligations to refugees.

Not even the brutal assaults Y.G. routinely suffered on account of her being transgender, nor Dayami Gonzalez’s kidnapping and rape, could move the U.S. government to live up to its own supposed humanitarian standards. These two women fled Cuba in 2019 only to be betrayed by this country’s oppressive border policy. The previous administration hypocritically spouted coarse rhetoric about intolerable repression in Cuba, while rejecting Cuban refugees at every turn. These two were stranded in Tamaulipas also for a year and a half, despite being eligible for desperately-needed assistance in Miami, where their family members—U.S. citizens and permanent residents—worried for their safety and anxiously awaited being reunited.

Now sixty days into the new administration, relief has finally come for these families. The new President vowed to end the “Remain in Mexico” policy. Elia and her toddler, as well as Dayami and Y.G.—all clients of the ACLU of Florida—have now been processed into the United States to pursue their asylum cases. Still additional steps to provide meaningful access to protection for all individuals subjected to MPP and other anti-asylum and anti-immigrant policies during the Trump administration need to be taken. The Biden Administration should return U.S. asylum seekers with pending cases who are waiting in Mexico and release them on recognizance, bond, parole, or alternatives to detention while their cases proceed in immigration court. This change in policy could mean life or death for those awaiting outcomes to their cases.

Floridians who celebrate the promise of America should welcome these developments and advocate for these policy changes in support of those seeking protection. We honor our state’s successful legacy of immigration by affording these newcomers a chance. They have endured enough, including for doing just what the law asked of them. People seeking protection in this country must never again be held hostage to the whims of political opportunists.

The Biden administration will also need to pull out of shoddy enforcement arrangements peddled by the previous administration to co-opt our state and local governments, and pull back from an exorbitant immigration detention model that prioritizes pretextually holding large numbers of people in punitive conditions for long periods of time to discourage them from fully pursuing their cases. These steps will be necessary to begin dispelling the insidious false myth that immigration poses a threat to our communities and to fully turn the page on four years of systematic immigrant abuse. We must meet the moment and work to rebuild an immigration system that ensures fairness for all.

Much like the events following the police raid at New York’s Stonewall Inn in June 1969 – which helped trigger what we now celebrate as LGBTQ+ Pride – there has long since been an ongoing rebellion led by transgender and gender non-conforming people, lesbians, gays, street hustlers, and several others, many of whom are people of color, against the violent and routine harassment they have long experienced at the hands of state officials.

That night at Stonewall wasn’t the first time we’d see such a coalition fight back against the forces that purported to serve, protect, and defend the rights of all Americans. It wouldn’t be the last, either.

In 1937, more than thirty years before Stonewall, a group of unsuspecting patrons ran for safety at a gay bar in Miami called La Paloma when dozens of people raided it. That raid, however, hadn’t been officially orchestrated by the police, but rather by the Ku Klux Klan. The Klan had implored the police to shut La Paloma down for weeks and insisted that if the police did not act soon, they would take matters into their own hands. And so they did. The police at least tacitly approved of it and later followed that raid up with a number of their own.

As the histories of both La Paloma and Stonewall make clear, LGBTQ+ rights can only be fully secured alongside the liberation of those most marginalized among us, including the full liberation of Black folks and other people of color, immigrants, and transgender and gender non-conforming people, among others.

Five years ago, in June 2016, a person waged a hate-filled attack of terrorism on the Pulse gay nightclub in Orlando and ended the lives of 49 people -- mostly LGBTQ+ people of color.

When the Pulse massacre occurred, it was the largest mass shooting in U.S. history. It no longer is. In fact, despite the countless number of tragic mass shootings that happened both before and after Pulse, we’ve seen almost no progress in gun control reform. These snapshots from our historical archives provide both guidance and roadmaps for moving forward.

LGBTQ+ Pride means defending the right to teach Black history and studies across our campuses in Florida and beyond, now demonized and banned in the form of the latest boogeyman known as “critical race theory.” Of course, Black history is LGBTQ+ history too. Pride also means defending the rights of immigrants, many of whom have been at the center of the LGBTQ+ movement from the start. It is also fighting back against attacks on transgender people in the state and beyond, most recently by prohibiting them from playing school sports.

LGBTQ+ liberation will only ever come to fruition if we maintain a vision of full liberation for us all.